Lawyer C Luo said that the media reported the fraud of documents and evidence, and both parties were purely voluntary.

Lawyer Peter S Christiansen said in a statement that the report of 2009 reported by the media was stolen by hackers from European law firms and other institutions and then sold it.

Xinhua News Agency, Washington, October 11 -c Luo’s new criminal defense lawyer released a statement against media reports on the 10th. The statement said that the documents about the accusation of C Luo’s rape quoted in media reports were “completely fabricated”, and C Luo Jian claimed that the two sides volunteered with Mayorga.

Lawyer Peter S Christiansen said in a statement that the report of 2009 reported by the media was stolen by hackers from European law firms and other institutions and then sold it.

This statement admitted that Ronaldo and Mayorga reached a confidentiality agreement in Las Vegas in 2010, but Mayorga violated the agreement and made charges, and Ronaldo could no longer remain silent.

The statement said: “As Ronaldo has always insisted, what happened in Las Vegas in 2009 was essentially voluntary by both parties. These media reported that the documents involving Ronaldo were completely forged.” Christiansen condemned that “the media support and promotion of this kind of evidence are based on the slander of stolen and easily tampered electronic documents, which is really very sad”.

The Woman of C Luo’s sexual assault case, Mayorga, filed a lawsuit in Nevada on September 27, accusing C Luo of committing sexual assault against her in Las Vegas in 2009. Mayorga admitted that she accepted the compensation of 375000 dollars as “sealing fee”, but her lawyer said that she signed the agreement under the pressure of “middlemen” who tried to protect Ronaldo’s reputation, the lawsuit requires an additional compensation of at least 200000 dollars. After that, the Las Vegas police announced to restart the investigation on the case. At present, the police refused to publish the documents on the grounds of hearing the case again, and did not comment on the progress of the investigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *